Geolibertarianism, Universal Basic Income, and Public Services

I think the most "orthodox" geolibertarian perspective is that money from a 100% LVT outside the most minimal functions of government should go towards a Universal Basic Income (UBI); that would in theory be better than funding a bunch of government programs that can be coopted in such ways that benefit some people at the expense of others. From a Georgist perspective, UBI is the most consistent with the idea that everyone is equally entitled to the value of the land. Am I wrong? It may be better from a pragmatic perspective to fund some "extra" public services, but UBI (possibly with work requirements attached) would be closest to ideal.