10-20 vs 14-35

I just bought an R5 II (coming from an R10) and I've never had a lens wider than 28mm equivalent (18mm on APS-C). I'm thinking the 14-35 is more practical but the 10-20 would itch my UWA scratch the best lol. I'd assume the 10-20 is a decent bit sharper but the bulk of the price increase is to have 10-13mm. Is that worth $1k extra while losing 21-35mm?