It is unethical to release evidence through paid media

We need an honest discussion about the ethics around releasing NHI/UAP related evidence and how it's being shared with the public. If someone truly had compelling evidence of non-human intelligence or UAPs/UFOs, there's a strong argument that keeping it private or releasing it through paid media is ethically questionable. With paid media I am mostly referring to books, documentaries, news specials (ad revenue), etc.

Think about it: If you stumbled upon evidence that could fundamentally change our understanding of humanity's place in the universe, would it be right to keep that to yourself or lock it behind a paywall? This kind of discovery would have profound implications for all of humanity.

While creators deserve compensation for their work, we should think critically about cases where supposedly groundbreaking evidence is only available through channels that generate cash flow. This creates an inherent conflict of interest, where financial incentives could influence how and when information is released.

The scientific method relies on open sharing of evidence and peer review where major scientific discoveries are typically published in academic journals, not commercial media. Again, financial incentives can create bias in how evidence is presented.

Anyone presenting so called evidence through these kinds of channels deserve to be met with a healthy dose of skepticism. We all need to be on our guard we are not falling for these kinds of schemes/psy ops.

IMO a better alternative would be to release your evidence immediately and for free, and ask for donations afterwards, explaining why you need the donations (i.e. to keep your research going or what have you).