Darth Bane Efficiency Start [And the one thing I loved this Conquest Cycle]
- The last time I made a post of this nature was 6 months ago, which I believe was the Conquest31-33 era - It took me 249 battles to mostly efficiently finish. You can find that post here
- Like before, I have not yet finished Conquest, however I am close enough to finishing that I can accurately figure out how many outstanding battles need to be done
Current Stats:
- Initial Energy: 7
- Daily Battles from energy regeneration: 56
- Battles from Refreshes: 180
- Battles Outstanding: 14
- Total Battles: 257 battles
Additional Notes:
- I would estimate that I "dropped" less than 5 battles inefficiently
- I actually got very lucky on data discs this time around
- I do think that I can tighten up these numbers by about 10% next time
Previous Conquest Stats:
- Conquest 1-3 were easily completable without any refreshes of energy needed [energy ratios different and sector breakdowns] at roughly 100 battles
- Conquest 7-9 - I estimated 100% efficiency at roughly 135 battles.
- Conquest 10-12 - I originally estimated the 100% efficiency at roughly 181 battles, but I think if I remember correctly we were able to get that down to around 170-175.
- Conquest 13-15 - Had deployable cooling systems as a big reward, which allowed people to see their exact battle count. . .If I remember correctly I ended at 176
- Conquest 21-23 - I referenced as completing the first run at 217 battles
- Conquest 31 - Is where I went first run at 249 battles
One really important note to consider is that at the moment Ewok battles ic clearly bugged and we do not yet reasonably know if it's bugged to 20, or if it's bugged to say 40.
FAQ
Egnards, nobody cares, why do you keep posting these things?
Quite honestly if I didn't post them, I wouldn't be able to keep track of efficiency over time, so this helps me to check back in every 6+ months to see how Conquest is evolving, whether you care or not.
Do people actually ask these questions?
No, I mean I guess not - Maybe it should be ACACF [Anticipated Comments and Complaints Replies]
And The One Thing I Loved About This Conquest
The fact that CG shifted Conquest to start on a Wednesday instead of a Monday, for the holidays, is proof that there is no need for them to always start on a Monday.
CG it was so much fucking better this time not having to start it on the same day as the most active day of Territory Battles. . .Like oh so much better. This would, in my opinion, be a huge QOL change for many players.
Even with having to do more than double the battles I had to do in the first few sets of Conquests. . .I just hated doing it so much less not having to get a jumpstart on the same day as another major type of content started.
I will. simp the shit out of you for all of a week before I forget and hate you again if this becomes a constant thing.
Applicable Egnards Links