If men are capable of having hookups that mean nothing to them, then so can women.

It’s always funny watching the manosphere having viewpoints based on benefitting the man and talking down to women, even if there's contradiction.

“Girls think they matter just because Chad fucks them. You’re just a hole to him and you should stop thinking you have higher value than you do!“ That’s the typical view I see when the topic of hookups come up, especially about how ‘the fat ugly bitches’ think theyre too good average guys because they can get dick from Chad, but Chad doesnt care about them to LTR.

Then suddenly, “Women should fuck a guy immediately to show she desires him”. I understand the hypocrisy. Like I said, its about what benefits the man. These Non-Chads need women to not feel validated screwing Chads so these women should ‘humble themselves’. However, since these Non-Chad see sex as validating, they refuse to believe that women with Chad’s (alleged) mindset exist.

So women should understand that “Sex means nothing and you can just be a convenient wet hole”. But also, women cant ever think “Oh, I just need my pussy plowed and found a walking dildo to bounce on”? So sex shows men are desirable but never that women are desirable?

This is also another example of men ruining things for other men. Devaluing women who enjoy fucking men and taking them for granted, so then the women who do care about being respected by guys are going to be more guarded about who they have sex with.

Now, back to the women with Chad’s mindset on sex (lets say FemChad for simplicity). Even if its not common, women are still capable of treating hookups as a form of masturbation and it barely has anything to do with the sexual partner being special. However, they still want a higher quality lover when they’re looking for a relationship. Just like the women that Chad hooks up with are mostly not relationship material to him, FemChads can have hookups that she would never want to spend with out of the bed.