Serious question- why would the feds not include these pics in the complaint?

The photos from Starbucks were some of the first released ones to the public used to track down their suspect.

If they’re asserting this is LM, why in gods name why would these photos not be included in the federal complaint? If these photos ARE of him, it is their best evidence that he is guilty, because the appearance of this individual and the man who pewpewed BT are identical.

I really can’t wrap my head around this especially because they used almost every other cctv footage pic in the complaint.

Anyone have any ideas?