A tri-Omni God does NOT violate free will

For transparency sake, I don’t hold to the traditional tri-Omni God model. I do agree that “God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and that His Spirit can be felt by all people, everywhere.” However there also seems to be a difference between my understanding and belief and the standard.

For example, there are a few things God can’t do.

He can’t lie

He can’t sin

He can’t violate agency (the point of this post in a sense)

He can’t change

He can’t make a contradiction in logic (a round square, a married bachelor, a rock so big he can’t lift it)

He can’t create from nothing

Etc

So the “all powerful” statement seems to mirror more in line with having all power and ability that it’s possible to have.

With all of that in the background, I still don’t feel that even those that hold to the traditional trinity-Omni god goes against free will.

Let’s break it down point by point.

All knowing: god has all knowledge. He knows everything that will happen or can happen. Including what we will do, and where we will fall short.

If I knew all things, it doesn’t mean I suddenly control or rob people of their free will.

Let’s say that I see a car crash yesterday, I could time travel and go back and I would KNOW that the car was going to crash. And yet I wouldn’t be forcing them to crash. I would control them crashing or lack there of. Their actions and choices are their own. Even though I had a perfect for-knowledge of what was going to happen.

All powerful: God can do anything. Assuming the traditional sense, he could make whole new planets or dimensions. He could control all of us and make us puppets. And yet, he doesn’t or doesn’t need or have or will to. Having the ability to do something, doesn’t mean that one does that thing. I could crash into a wall in my car, it doesn’t mean I will or want to.

Everywhere: I feel this just goes along with all knowing. There is nowhere to hide. All things are known.

So, to me, instead of the triomni God violating free will, it’s rather that he could if he wanted to, but doesn’t.

You may wish he could. Or think he should. But that doesn’t mean he is or does.

We could get into “if he is all loving then why doesn’t he”, but I think that’s for another time. All one would need is a simple reason why he chooses not to do x, y, or z.

Edit: oh I forgot, I would love to hear your thoughts. I’m open to new ideas.

I should also note, I typically find debates very counter productive. Overly hostile and ending in name calling and belittlement. Seeking more discussion and exchange of ideas rather than persuasion. Thanks, yall rock.

Edit 2: ** let me be clear. This IS NOT a debate about my beliefs or conclusions. It IS ONLY a debate and discussion on how the tri-Omni God does not violate free will. I gave a brief example of my beliefs as a background, to state I’m not fully versed in the subject or adhering to it. The topic is not my beliefs. It’s the traditional/standard tri-Omni God and free will. Thank you **