Still no docs uploaded to the docket while we’re missing several and now this. Motion to compel ICT 16(b)(7) Material and for sanctions

I’m so frustrated there aren’t even words for it.

Case summary.

https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/Summary/Case-Summary-Kohberger-12272024.pdf

Explanation for ICT 16(b)(7)

Idaho Criminal Rule 16(b)(7) pertains to the disclosure of expert witnesses by the prosecution upon a defendant’s written request. Specifically, it requires the prosecutor to provide a written summary or report of any testimony intended for trial or hearings under Idaho Rules of Evidence 702, 703, or 705. This summary must include the expert’s opinions, the basis and reasons for those opinions, and the expert’s qualifications. Additionally, disclosures involving expert opinions on mental health must comply with Idaho Code § 18-207. It’s important to note that this rule does not mandate the disclosure of rebuttal expert witnesses whose testimony is intended solely to counter evidence or theories not previously disclosed under this rule. 

They’ve also erred while filing it. Should be ICR and not ICT.