Do the terms "neurodivergent" and "neurotypical" bother anyone else?

I'm aware this is a really petty/insignificant thing for me to be annoyed by, but I can't help it lol. I'm also open to changing my stance, so if you have a different viewpoint please share!

I don't like the term because it doesn't have a clear definition. I'm drawn to things with explicit guidelines. "Neurodivergent," at least the time I looked it up, doesn't have a set criteria/comprehensive list of what qualifies. Some people I've seen think it means ASD/ADHD only, some say it's all neurodevelopmental disorders, some think it means any recognized mental disorder, etc.. it gets confusing. When someone says ND or NT, I have no idea what exactly they're referring to. I prefer to refer to myself with the exact conditions I have, but it gets tricky when trying to make greater generalizations.

Also, I know this doesn't directly correlate to the terms being valid or invalid, but I've never heard a medical professional (in person) use "neurodivergent" or "neurotypical." I think I heard one therapist use it but that was it. Have any of you ever heard a medical professional use the terms in person?

In my opinion, the best alternative we have at the moment is using the DSM-5-TR (or whatever the most recent update to it is) categorization depending on what we're talking about. Or, if we have a small amount of specific conditions in mind, saying each one individually. While it's the clearest (to me, at least), it's not very easy for people to use and can get lengthy. I wish there were better options. If anyone has another idea, please tell me.

One more thing: do you think "neurodivergent" and "neurotypical" will ever become official medical terms? Do you think that would be a good or bad thing?